黄金马车

简介：姚克一年前从大陆迁居澳门继承遗产，不料在生意场上被人骗走40万巨款，幸亏他的情人、深圳乐美化妆品公司经理李萍挪用公司大笔外汇，帮他还清了债务，李萍却因此受到检察机关指挥犯有经济贪污罪。多年来，李萍与女儿婷婷相依为命，自从姚克出现，李萍把一切都寄托在深爱她的姚克身上，因此不能眼见他陷入困境而不救助。姚克不忍李萍受牵连，冒险买下两本非法护照，准备携李萍出境。特区检察院的肖宇光以国际刑警的身份到澳门取得了李萍娜用公款的证据后回到深圳，在检察院的会议上提出自己对这一事件的看法。他认为李萍在公司危难之际接任经理，并接连研制了几个创优产品，名扬海内，使公司扭亏为盈，自己也成为特区经济改革中的一位女强人，这样的人陷入经济犯罪案令人惋惜。虽然现有的证据已经可以立即逮捕她，但她掌握着几个主要产品的秘密配方，在第二天的新产品鉴定会上只有她才能代表公司出席答辩，如果逮捕她，该公司很快就得停产，职工和国家的经济利益都会遭受到巨大损失，经过研究，检察长对此案做出了特殊决定：暂缓逮捕，让李萍出席答辩会。肖宇光找到李萍，要她振作精神，用行动争取政府宽大处理。李萍本已心灰意冷，此刻十分感动。姚克密约李萍出走，李萍陷入极度矛盾与痛苦中，在姚克苦求下答应了他。姚克随后用武力追回了被骗走的巨款。李萍出席答辩会之际，女儿突然发病，肖宇光赶来主动留下代她照顾孩子，并对她表示了充分的信任。李萍内心充满感激与悔恨。答辩会结束，李萍步出会场，注视着焦急等候的姚克，凄然摇头离去。姚克陷于孤独之中。在亲友的鼓励下，他终于手提巨款走进检察院的大门。

简介：冷酷粗暴的流浪汉约翰尼（大卫·休里斯 David Thewlis饰）来到伦敦寻找自己的前任女友路易丝·克兰西（莱丝莉·夏普 Lesley Sharp饰），从一座失业问题严重的工业城市曼彻斯特来到交织在光鲜与黑暗中的大都市伦敦。约翰尼结识了路易丝的室友索菲（凯特琳·卡特利吉 Katrin Cartlidge饰），两人当天就在公寓做了爱。一觉醒来，已经爱上约翰尼的索菲得到的却是约翰尼一副玩世不恭的冷面拒绝。愤世嫉俗的约翰尼不仅仇视女性，也痛恨着自己与他身处的一切。他冷漠地与陌生女人做爱，绝望地与这个世界暴力相向。　　本片荣获1993年第46届戛纳电影节主竞赛单元-最佳导演大奖，男主角大卫·休里斯凭借此片荣获最佳男演员奖，本片也同时入围第46届戛纳电影节主竞赛单元-金棕榈奖。

简介：极具生意头脑但游手好闲的大国（马东锡 饰），意外认识了技术高超但被吊销营业执照的整容医生智友（郑敬淏 饰），二人一拍即合，雄心壮志的大国势要改写韩国整容史。凭着摸爬滚打多年的社交手腕，大国成功接通黑白两路，整容医院不仅迅速爆红，更冲出国际吸引外国人来组团换脸。当他俩的整容帝国如日中天时，背后却有人对他们的生意虎视眈眈，成功令无数男女改写命运的大国，这次能否帮自己大翻身？

简介：19世纪初，波兰-立陶宛帝国遭到俄罗斯、普鲁士和奥地利的入侵，帝国犹如大厦将倾，岌岌可危。正在危急时刻，一部分波兰人将希望寄托在拿破仑的身上。他们与拿破仑达成协议，法军帮助波兰人拯救家园，作为回报，波兰人将协助法国人攻打俄罗斯。　　在波兰的乡间有两个对立的显赫贵族，他们的仇恨从18世纪末便已延续。霍里斯兹克家族支持独立，亲善法国；苏普里卡则对俄国向存好感。两个家族的矛盾在国破家亡之际更加激烈，而苏普里卡家的塔杜斯（Michal Zebrowski 饰）却在这个时刻爱上了对方的女子……　　本片根据立陶宛（波兰）诗人Adam Mickiewicz的长篇叙事诗《Pan Tadeusz》改编，并荣获2000年波兰电影奖最佳女演员、最佳摄影、最佳剪辑等六项奖。

简介：1980年比利时的默兹河畔，钢铁厂一家接一家地倒闭，成千上万的工人不得不另谋生路，居住于瑟兰的钢铁工人法布里斯也未能幸免于难。原本以丰富的钢铁知识和精湛的业务水平引以为傲的他，觉得自己仿佛一夜之间成了身无一技之长的废人，从此一蹶不振。深爱他的妻子席琳为了帮助丈夫振作起来做了各种努力，却仍换来他的不告而别。对丈夫的爱使她始终不曾放弃寻找，然而这份爱又能否拯救那个心如死灰的男人？

简介：电影导演莎莉（莎莉·波特 Sally Potter 饰）在创作新剧本时遇到了灵感堵塞，她烦恼不已，却又无济于事。在观看一场激情肆意的探戈舞演出后，莎莉被深深感染，仿佛找到了一些灵感。她决心暂时抛下工作，开始学习探戈舞。她去巴黎旅行遇上了有名的探戈舞者帕布罗，被他的舞蹈所吸引。于是提出让他在自己的下部电影里演出，以帕布罗教她跳舞作为交换条件。莎莉越来越沉迷于探戈舞，在与帕布罗学习探戈的过程中，他们彼此爱上了对方。但来自不同文化背景的两人，性格有着极大的反差：来自南美的帕布罗有着强烈的控制欲，他习惯掌控选舞、音乐等一切细节，甚至包括与莎莉的爱情；而作为女性主义者的莎莉却是决定帕布罗参与她的影片的关键人。两人之间的关系时而紧张，时而悠然，一场爱情之战悄悄开始。

简介：《圣彼得堡，我爱你》讲述了发生在一座真实且生机勃勃的城市里的七段故事，这些故事让你相信奇迹的存在。这个城市的屋顶可供你跳舞，这个城市的铜像栩栩如生，城市的诗人约瑟夫·布罗茨基可以因拍摄以他为题的一部影片焕发新生。每个短片故事都是关于爱与孤独，希望与好运的讲述。这是一场七位女性导演为涅瓦河上的城市——圣彼得堡献上的镜头盛宴。

简介：

【剧情】英国黑帮片“杰克三部曲”的终结篇，讲述前卧底警官Jack Adleth，返回伦敦寻找那些试图在阿姆斯特丹杀他的人。

简介：二十世纪七十年代，年轻的苏格兰医生尼古拉斯•哥瑞肯（James McAvoy 詹姆斯•麦艾维 饰）踌躇满志，怀着为穷苦人民救死扶伤的伟大理想来到了贫困的乌干达。在此他结识了医学会的白人同事，美丽的莎拉（Gillian Anderson 吉莉•安德森 饰），深深为之所吸引 。　　某次集会上，尼古拉斯得以见到乌干达总统安迪•阿明（Forest Whitaker 福里斯特•惠特克 饰），阿明的言论使尼古拉斯甚为着迷，甚至狂热崇拜。集会之后，他救助了因事故受伤的阿明，并因其苏格兰人身份受到赏识。之后更以总统御用医生的身份走近这位残暴君主……　　影片改编自Giles Foden的同名小说，男主角福里斯特•惠特克凭借此片获得第79届奥斯卡奖最佳男主角奖。

简介：上世纪七八十年代的河南古城安阳，某个五口之家的姐姐（张静初）、哥哥（冯瓅）和弟弟（吕玉来）在社会剧烈转型时期，踏上不同的人生之路。　　姐姐二十出头，虽看起来清瘦文静，内心却刚烈执拗，为实现梦想可以将自己豁出，无奈现实无情，经过多次挫败后她学会听天由命；哥哥二十三四岁，因小时得病落下轻微脑疾，父母对他的关爱皆多一层，经人介绍与精明的跛脚姑娘结婚后，他过上自己很满意的日子；弟弟十七八岁，敏感、忧郁，内心世界过于丰富，因为某件事被父亲赶出家门后，开始在外面找寻属于自己的生活，然而所获只是时间将其改造得面目全非。

简介：小男孩雨果（阿沙·巴特菲尔德 Asa Butterfield 饰）天生机械控。他寄宿巴黎火车站钟楼，偶尔会去玩具店偷些零件，用来修补父亲（裘德·洛 Jude Law 饰）留下的机器人。一次行窃，他被店主乔治•梅里埃（本·金斯利 Ben Kingsley 饰）当场抓获，因 忌惮带猎狗的巡警（萨莎·拜伦·科恩 Sacha Baron Cohen 饰）只得就范。乔治拿走了雨果父亲的遗物——一本机械手册，令他心急如焚，他尾随至乔治家中，结识了养女伊莎贝拉（科洛·莫瑞兹 Chloë Moretz 饰），他恳求她帮自己保住手册。而伊莎贝拉则觉得此事蹊跷，于是两人结伴探秘。修好的机器人作画的落款却显示乔治的名字，让他们疑心顿起。终于他们发现了乔治家中装满画作的神秘柜子，并在图书馆的电影书籍中发现了乔治的身世。一位知情人的显身，让他们的奇幻冒险更添神秘……　　本片根据布莱恩•瑟兹尼克的同名小说改编，是马丁•斯科塞斯的首部3D力作。

简介：Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.